Apocrypha- Recipe for
Imitation Bible
Start with a pinch of Homer, add two cups of scriptural
interpretation, slowly pour in some secret ingredients and blend
with copious amounts of wild imagination. Chop into 11 parts
(more depending on your appetite), cook on low heat, and let
simmer for 1500 years. Serve along with Scripture.
This recipe for imitation Bible is known as the
Apocrypha. The Roman Catholic Church serves it as main fare in
their version of the Scriptures. Before you indulge in this
literary concoction, first consider the ingredients. Apocrypha
means “things hidden or concealed.” It is from the Greek word
apokryphos and it concerns writings that at first were not read
publicly. Later, Apocrypha came to be understood as spurious and
uncanonical writings.
In common usage, Apocrypha refers to the 11 books (some say
14) made a part of some Bibles by the Roman Catholic Church at
the Council of Trent in 1546. This council itself dropped three
of the apocryphal books that had been admitted at the Council of
Carthage in 397. Those dropped were Prayer of Manasses and 1 and
2 Esdras. All three had appeared for 1,100 years in the Latin
Vulgate version of the Bible, completed by Jerome in 405.
The Apocrypha was written between the third and first
centuries B.C.E. in the period between the Old and New
Testaments. Because of that, some Bibles place the Apocrypha
between their Old and New Testament pages.
The books generally recognized as constituting the Apocrypha
are: 1, 2 Maccabees; Prayer of Manasses; 1, 2 Esdras; Tobit;
Judith; Wisdom; Ecclesiasticus (a.k.a. Sirach); Baruch and
Epistle of Jeremy; supplements to Esther and three additions to
Daniel include: The Song of the Three Children, Susanna and the
Elders, the
Destruction of Bel and the Dragon; and the Letters of
Jeremiah.
Jews Rejected Apocrypha
The trend toward including these works as part of the
Scriptures was initiated by Augustine in 354 to 430. Although
acknowledging some of the historical values of the books,
Augustine admitted there was a definite difference between these
“outside books” and the Inspired Word.
These spurious works were found in the Septuagint, the Greek
translation of the Old Testament. This fact alone gives no
credence to the argument that the Apocrypha was part of the
inspired canon, because no original copies of the Septuagint
exist to support such a position. In fact, the Jewish Council of
Jamnia in 90 C.E. specifically excluded the Apocrypha from the
Hebrew canon of Inspired Scripture.
It was the Jews who were entrusted with preserving the Old
Testament Bible. Paul testified to that fact, “What advantage
then has the Jew? or what profit is there of circumcision? Much
every way: chiefly, because that unto them were committed the
oracles of Yahweh,” Romans 3:1-2. By oracles Paul meant the
actual words of Yahweh, given to Moses and the prophets, Acts
7:38.
No other literary work has been preserved better through the
ages than the Bible. The Scribes were meticulous in their
dedication to transcribe Scripture exactly. If there were any
authenticity to the Apocrypha the Jews would have recognized it.
On the contrary. They rejected it.
Neither was any stamp of approval given by Josephus, the
first century historian. He said, “For there are not with us
myriads of books, discordant and discrepant, but only two and
twenty (equivalent to the 39 books of Hebrew Scripture),
comprising the history of all time, which are justly
accredited.”
Josephus acknowledged that the Hebrew Canon was complete
following the books of Nehemiah and Malachi in the 5th century
B.C.E. He wrote, “From the time of Artaxerxes up to our own
everything has been recorded, but the records have not accounted
equally worthy of credit with those written before them, because
the exact succession of prophets ceased.” The Bible itself is
testimony to the great lengths Yahweh went to preserve the
Scriptures.
Jeremiah had been prophesying for 23 years in the 36th
chapter of his book. Yahweh commanded him to write his
prophecies in a book to be read in the synagogue. When King
Jehoiakim heard some of the prophecies he threw the scroll into
a fire. With the help of a scribe, Jeremiah rewrote the entire
book through Yahweh’s inspiration. If the apocryphal books
were to be part of the Hebrew Canon, why is not a single one of
them quoted in the New Testament? There are hundreds of
quotations of the Old Testament included in the New, yet not one
original quotation from one of the apocryphal books is found.
Books with Flaws
The Bible contains no errors. Any mistakes found in modern
translations are by translators or editors. Most did not have a
grasp of Yahweh’s entire plan of salvation and didn’t understand
how the Bible complements itself. The mere historical and
literary accuracy of Scripture is testimony to holy inspiration.
The same is not true of the Apocrypha. The best evidence for
the bogus nature of the Apocrypha is found in the books
themselves. Two of the writers imply that the works are not
inspired. In the prologue to Ecclesiasticus (Sirach), we find,
”...my grandfather Jesus, after devoting himself especially to
the reading of the law and the prophets and the other books of
our fathers, and after acquiring considerable proficiency in
them, was himself led to write wisdom...” We get the idea of a
cut-and- paste job in the books of Maccabees. From 2 Maccabees
2:25 and 28 we discover this admission, “We have aimed to please
those who wish to read, to make it easy for those who are
inclined to memorize, and to profit all readers...leaving the
responsibility for exact details to the compiler, while devoting
our effort to arriving at the outlines of condensation.”
Lacking a prophetic element, the Apocrypha at times
contradict the Bible and even themselves. They are full of
historical and geological inaccuracies as well as errors in fact
and mistakes in time. Each of these mistakes is witness to the
fallible men who wrote them.
Their Errors Are Legion
Let’s take a look at a few of the Apocryphal books and
discover why they are classified as uninspired.
The Book of Tobit or Tobias is about a pious Jew who is
deported to Nineveh. Blinded by bird dung, he sends his son
Tobias to collect a debt. During the journey Tobias acquires the
gall of a fish that restores his father’s sight.
Estimated to be from the third century B.C.E., Tobit has a
serious chronological flaw, among other problems. It says Tobit
saw the revolt of the northern tribes (997 B.C.E.) and was on
the scene when the tribe of Naphtali was deported to Ninevah
(740 B.C.E.). That would mean he lived more than 257 years. But
Tobit 14:1-3 gives his age as 102 when he died.
The fact of two authors brings confusion to the Book of
Baruch. The first five chapters are made to look as if Baruch
wrote them. The sixth chapter is presented as a letter written
by Jeremiah. Baruch is said to live in Babylon (1:1, 2) although
the Bible says he went to Egypt. In his preface to the Book of
Jeremiah, Jerome said, “I have not thought it worthwhile to
translate the Book of Baruch.”
In Judith events are said to have occurred during the reign
of Nebuchadnezzar who is called the king “who reigned over the
Assyrians in the great city of Ninevah,” Judith 1:1, 7. The fact
is that Nebuchadnezzar was king of Babylon and never reigned in
Ninevah because Ninevah was destroyed by Nebuchadnezzar’s
father, Nabopolassar. Furthermore, the introduction to the
Jerusalem Bible notes that the itinerary of officer Holofernes
is a “geographical impossibility.”
A case of mistaken authorship is found in Wisdom. Certain
texts in this book present Solomon as its author (9:7, 8, 12).
The Jerusalem Bible states that this is a “literary device,”
because Wisdom cites passages of Scripture written centuries
after Solomon died. Also in Wisdom are advanced the erroneous
doctrines of the immortality of the soul (2:23; 3:2, 4) as well
as the preexistence of human souls, 8:19, 20 and 9:15. Wisdom of
Solomon (11:17) states that G-d “created the world out of
formless matter.” Tobit and Judith contain many historical,
chronological, and geographical errors.
Perhaps the most valuable of the Old Testament Apocrypha are
I and II Maccabees. These two books arebasically historical
accounts of the Jewish struggle for independence during the
second century B.C.E. They concern the exploits of a priest
named Mattathias and his five sons who revolted against
Antiochus Epiphanes in his attempt to destroy the Jews and their
religion. The works are characteristically written from the
human standpoint and did not form part of the inspired Canon.
New Forgeries Flourish
With the advent of the New Testament, new apocryphal works
popped up like blossoms in April. There are about 50 spurious
“gospels” besides many apocryphal Acts and Epistles. Written
mostly beginning in the second century, these works imitated the
Evangels, Acts, Letters of Paul and Revelation.
They were partly an attempt to fill in the gaps purposely
left open by the inspired New Testament writers. For example,
two books purport to detail the events of Yahshua’s youth,
information the Bible is purposely silent on. They picture Him
as a capricious child performing miracles at whim
with supernatural powers.
Of the later apocryphal works, The Interpreter’s Dictionary
of the Bible says, “Many of them are trivial, some are highly
theatrical, some are disgusting, even loathsome.” These
imitation works were excluded from the New Testament writings in
the same way the Hebrew Canon was kept pure of the older
Apocrypha.
The Apocrypha are the source of some of the dogmas of the
Roman Catholic Church. Here is a glimpse of some of the spurious
works appearing after the New Testament’s advent:
• Gospel of Nicodemus. A purely imaginary report on the trial
of Yahshua to the emperor Tiberius (2nd or 5th century).
• Passing of Mary. Silly miracles, ending with the removal of
her “spotless and precious body” to Paradise. Written in the 4th
century with the rise of virgin worship.
• Nativity of Mary. Deliberate forgery of the 6th century to
further worship of the Virgin Mary. Stories about daily visits
of angels to Mary. Immensely popular as papacy grew.
• The Gospel of the Egyptians. Imaginary conversations
between Yahshua and Salome (130-150)
• Gospel of Pseudo-Matthew. (note the name!) A 5th century
forged translation of Matthew, abounding with the supposed
childhood miracles of Yahshua.
• Gospel of Thomas. A 2nd century work on Yahshua’s life from
the 5th to the 12th year. Makes him a miracle worker to satisfy
his boyish whims.
• Apocalypse of Peter. Purported visions of heaven and hell
granted to Peter. Called spurious by Eusebius.
Bible’s Truth Preserved
With all the attempts to imitate the Bible, the holy
inspiration of Scripture is borne out time after time. With each
archaeological discovery, the Bible and its authenticity stand
durable. The Psalmist wrote, “The statutes of Yahweh are right,
rejoicing the heart; the commandment of Yahweh is pure,
enlightening the eyes. The fear of Yahweh is clean, enduring
forever: the judgments of Yahweh are true and righteous
altogether,” Psalm 19:8 and 9.
Henry Halley, in his Bible Handbook, sums up the Bible’s
veracity beautifully: “If you assume that the Bible is just what
it appears to be, accept the books as we have them in the Bible
as units, study them to know their contents, you will find there
a unity of thought indicating that one mind inspired the writing
and compilation of the whole series of books. That it bears on
its face the stamp of its author. [Yahweh] Himself superintended
and directed and dictated the writing of the Bible books, with
the human authors so completely under His control that the
writing was [Yahweh’s] writing. The Bible is [Yahweh’s] Word, in
a sense that no other book in the world is [Yahweh’s] Word.”
Eight Reasons Why the Apocrypha
Are Not Inspired Scripture
• Unlike other Scriptures, none of the apocryphal writers
claims to be inspired.
• Unlike the Old Testament, the Apocrypha are nowhere quoted
in the New.
• The Apocrypha are tainted with errors in fact and time,
exposing non-inspiration.
• The Apocrypha contain fabulous statements which not only
contradict the “canonical” scriptures but also themselves. For
example, in the two Books of Maccabees, Antiochus Epiphanes is
made to die three different deaths in three different places.
• The Apocrypha include doctrines in variance with the Bible,
such as prayers for the dead, sinless perfection, and
immortality of the soul.
• The apocryphal books were never acknowledged as sacred
scriptures by the Jews, custodians of the Hebrew Scriptures.
In fact, the Jewish people rejected and destroyed the Apocrypha
after the overthrow of Jerusalem in 70 CE.
• Not one of the apocryphal books is written in the Hebrew
language, which was used by all the inspired writers of the Old
Testament. All apocryphal books are in Greek, except one which
exists only in Latin.
• The apocryphal books were not permitted among the sacred
books during the first four centuries of the common era.
